Records Inappropriately accessed
It has been reported that the ECS of patients in Scotland has been accessed without patient consent. It is not kwon how many patients have been affected and when I was listening to the news last night it seems the NHS trust in question (Fife) do not know when the records were accessed or why they were accessed.
As usual, here are a couple of links about it.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/7763349.stm
More access to health records?
It is not long since people like me warned about the increasing access to our medical records and now the NHS seems to be confirming our greates fears.
Bellow are links to stories about how there are plans to increase the amount of people with access to our records. It is bad enough a patient cant tell their GP something without having to let every doctor and nurse they see at the practice know about it despite there usually not being a ‘need to know’ basis, It is bad enough reception staff are getting access to our records and knowing our test results and what medications we have been issued, now they want to social care, voluntry orgs, private firms, researchers and never ending list.
Will doctors defend the patient right to privacy? Dont bank on it!
http://www.ehiprimarycare.com/news/3915/access_to_nhs_care_records_may_be_widened
http://www.ehiprimarycare.com/news/3947/data_sharing_review_has_messages_for_the_nhs
Emergency Care Summary
This is something that has been adapted in Scotland, but it seems not all patients are aware of it or who will have access to the information. Just so that I can put my mind to rest, here are the facts about it.
1) All prescriptions are uploaded and although only accessible for 42 days, it is kept for good (nobody seems to want to say why they keep it). These prescriptions include Viagra, Ant-depressants and medications used in an abortion.
“) The record is not only available to doctors and nurses treating you. It is also available to the admin staff, such as the receptionist. This means that if you are not willing to tell the lass on reception you are on Viagra, you should not allow her to access the record.
3) When I contacted NHS Grampian about the dangers of not allowing the receptionist access to the record, they could not provide any evidence to support the claim that saying no would in anyway endanger your life.
4) When a GP practice contacted their patients about the upload, 19% of patients opted out of it. This is about 1,500 times the opt-out received from the letter drop that NHSScotland did. As far as I know, no other GP practice has bothered to write to their patients about it and GPs refuse to tell patients who are sitting in front of them, that their medical info is shared nationally even though it would only take seconds to do so. The NHS refuses to say why GPs refuse to actively inform patients about the data sharing even though evidence suggest patients are not aware of the sharing which means the GPs are in effect in breach of the GMC/NHS codes of practice.
-
Archives
- June 2009 (1)
- April 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (2)
- December 2008 (1)
- November 2008 (6)
- October 2008 (2)
- September 2008 (1)
- August 2008 (2)
- July 2008 (3)
- May 2008 (1)
- April 2008 (5)
- March 2008 (2)
-
Categories
- abuse
- access
- betrayal
- CCTV
- CDs
- child rights
- confidential
- data rape
- data security
- databases
- dignity
- distrust
- Divorce
- drug test
- ECS
- employeers
- ethics
- exam
- exams
- GPs
- Grampian
- health
- health access
- Human rights
- hypocrite
- insurance
- intrusion
- lamp post
- medical
- medical exam
- morals
- NHS
- opt-out
- patient rights
- privacy
- researchers
- schools
- SNP
- strip search
- telephone
- toilet
- Uncategorized
- victim rights
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS